It was not an easy task to overcome the difficulties of various origins
that had to be faced by 'Nomads' (1999 - continues) in their first years of
life. No doubt because we were born with public will of academic-institutional
criticism. And social. What was not 'well seen' in those times of 'postmodern
hegemony and actuality'. 'Progre', of course. "Uncomfortable" publication,
especially for those who have used the University as their own cortijo and
referent of a model to understand and 'manage' all that carries the seal of the
institution, without anyone questioning the interests of the gang they led. (Some are intended to follow)
Overcoming those bad
moments (I recognize it) 'Nomads' has consolidated a specific 'Editorial
Policy', which has earned it a recognition that alastays us: the identity stamp
of 'Nomads' has to remain a platform from the That regardless of status or
'experiences', the emerging thinking 'without having to ask permission from
anyone'. Although, of course, we respect her, ours has never been the
'institutional culture'. (The Power). Because by culture we only understand the
slow (and effective) resistance of those who pretend to name reality from other
angles of look: we are interested in what is (is happening), which, in itself,
generates 'other written languages'. Like the artistic and literary production
and, especially, of the theater and the cinema. Not in vain we opt for the
subtitle 'Record of passages and maps in the culture and the knowledge'
Suggestions
& General Information: cabinet@emui.eu